About Me

Name: Kenneth Hanson
Location: Atlanta, GA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

No Joy On the Left - Just Disrespect

The relentless criticism of President Bush by the left has lacked any respect for the office of the president. Try to have a rational conversation about what policies are necessary to protect our homeland in a dangerous terrorist world, and the left launches into a rant about how the GOP paints anyone with their positions as not being patriotic. 

I don’t believe that.  Intelligent people can respectfully disagree.  People of all beliefs should be evaluated based on their positions and the facts, that’s all. 

However, I do see plenty of examples of politicians that I believe do not have our country’s best interests at heart, or are so over the top in their rhetoric they should called out.  I don’t care what party they’re in.  A constant reliance of broad, sweeping NYT’s stereotypes about conservatives makes it difficult to have a constructive dialogue.

Comparing our country to Nazi Germany (Obama, Durbin) or Pol Pot’s Cambodia (Durbin) is way over the line, and relies on the left’s use of the diversionary tactic of false equivalency.  People who rely on these types of histrionics are not people that you can have an intelligent and rational conversation with.  If they weren’t in Congress, they would be wearing pink cardboard crowns and standing in the back of a hearing shouting, “Ahhhhh, ahhhhh”, or picketing the Marine recruiting station in San Francisco.  When you have John Murtha doing a pretty good imitation of verdict first, show trial later Andre Vyshinsky in slandering our Marines in Haditha, Iraq, all perspective and rationality has been lost.

The issues and actions around national security, for example, are extremely complex, and require sophisticated and complex discussions, something foreign to congressional Democrats.  I do think there is a certain respect that is due the office of the president.  I don’t think naming a sewage treatment plant for a president is funny.  I don’t care who the president is or what party he is from. 

In spite of relentless and nasty criticism, Bush never stuck back in the small, mean-spirited style of his attackers.  Not easy to do.  Hopefully Democrats will be as understanding if conservatives are just as nasty to Obama. 

I am reminded of the famous Mark Twain quote, “Suppose you are an idiot.  And suppose you are a congressman.  But I repeat myself.”  But I digress.

Bush came to Washington with every intent to engage in a bi-partisan working style.  He has a great record reputation for bi-partisanship as governor in Texas.  It is his nature.  He made a valiant effort.  Neither side in Congress wanted anything to do with it.  Now Obama has selected a Democrat Tom Delay to be chief of staff.  Paul Begala, a loyal Democrat, describes Rahm Emmanuel as a “cross between hemorrhoid and toothache”.  Sounds pleasant.

I saw an interesting interview with SNL’s Lorne Michaels (politically left) the other day.  He was commenting on the difference in reactions to skits poking fun at people on the right verses people on the left.  He says that the reaction he gets from conservatives is much more accepting than from the left.  According to Michaels, conservatives enjoy laughing at themselves.  The calls and e-mails he gets from the Democrats and the left are mostly just angry.   There is no joy on the left (or in Mudville).

The bottom line is that the Democrat’s and the left’s lack of respect for the office of the president has further damaged our country’s ability to solve its problems in a bi-partisan manner, and reduced our stature in the world. 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thoughts On Thomas Sowell's "Intellectuals"

http://townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2008/11/11/intellectuals

Like Sowell, I was bemused by Nicholas Kristof’s column Sunday.  There are lots of other examples of what Sowell talked about in his response, "Intellectuals".  Reagan was dismissed as actor and a simpleton.  But before being elected president Reagan criss-crossed the country for a decade, speaking to groups about conservative principles and how to defeat communism, honing his ideas.  He was deeply knowledgeable and articulate.  In his first term (less so in the second) he brought in the most capable executive team since Kennedy.

George H. W. Bush was dismissed as a lifelong government bureaucrat, but when crisis hit, he formed the most impressive global coalition in history to drive Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait. 

I believe that history will show that George W. Bush understood the complexities of the global war on terror far beyond his “intellectually superior” opponents on the left – to our country’s benefit.  We have had hints now and again as the NYT’s has giddily compromised some of the most successful lines of attack, such as our success in tracking and shutting down al Qaeda financial transactions.  I believe that history will show that Bush has directed a multi-faceted offense and defense with a level of sophistication that is highly effective.

The administration of Bill Clinton (a Rhodes Scholar) had repeated chances to take out or capture Bin Laden.  Blustery protests to the contrary, and damning notes spirited out of the National Archives stuffed down the pants of loyal Clintonistas aside, they never had the fortitude to “pull the trigger”.  The article in the NYT’s about the program for rapid approval of special ops missions in a number of countries harboring al Qaeda was interesting on several levels.  I was encouraged by the strong governance of the order, with many more missions being rejected than approved.  But on a small number of occasions, it appears about 10 over the last 3 or so years, the administration has “pulled the trigger” to go in and get the bad guys when the rewards outweighed the risks.

I have often reflected on the William F. Buckley comment mentioned by Sowell that he would rather be governed by the first 100 names in the Boston phone book than the faculty of Harvard.  So-called intellectuals think they are so smart they can solve any problem through central planning.  Because they are so “smart”, they believe they can ignore well-established principals, truths and common sense.  Even Plato argued for an intellectual elite ruling class.  Perhaps he was the “first liberal”.  Every example in history of state-controlled media and thought and a centrally planned economy has been a catastrophe.  Their ego is their downfall.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama & Guantanamo: The False Appearance of Substance

Obama pledged during the campaign to close the prison at Guantanamo.  Now his advisors are working on a plan to do just that. 

A quick historical recap is in order.  President Bush decided that in accordance with previous war precedent that these captured enemy combatants should be tried by military tribunal.  Trial by military tribunal is a long-standing tradition for these types of situations in our country’s history, and around the world.  In a case brought before the Supreme Court, it ruled that it was fine to proceed with the plan of military tribunals, but the rules for the tribunals had to be set by Congress.  The Bush administration then worked with Congress and worked it the appropriate procedures.  Understandably, the rules are constrained in some cases by very sensitive intelligence information.

Now back to the Obama plan.  Team Obama is working to shut down Guantanamo and ship the enemy combatants to some sort of U.S. based facility.  They are also planning, due to sensitive intelligence issues, to create a new special court system to hear a number of the cases.  This court would be separate from the normal civilian court system with special rules. 

Now call me crazy, but this sounds an awful lot like the military tribunal process that has already been agreed to by the administration and Congress.  The administration and Congress spent something like two years working this all out and now Obama wants to create something that is different, but basically the same. 

I hope this is not an indication that Obama will not always be about appearance over substance.  This sounds like an awful lot of work just so Obama can say he did it “his way”.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »